July 3, 2012

The dark visions of Alberto Vitale

by

Former Random House CEO Alberto Vitale is back from the dead, expounding on the future of publishing and desperately trying to seem relevant in a long interview posted on Publishing Perspectives. The site grandly calls him one of the “most recognizable figures in the history of [the] American publishing industry,” but it’s hard to imagine how this missive from Vitale, who left Random House in 2002, will be of use to anyone in today’s publishing business.

For those who don’t remember, Vitale is the career money guy who worked first for Bantam Books and then at Random House under S.I. Newhouse. His love for books is far from recognizable: he wandered into publishing, as he describes it in the interview, and seems never really to have understood it. (When he stepped down as Random House CEO he summarized publishing as a “crapshoot business.”)

Pressed to name some books he looks back fondly on, he cheers for celebrity memoirs by Colin Powell and Lee Iacocca. It’s not surprising. The last time Vitale surfaced, in a podcast for the Wharton School of Business, he sang the praises of George W. Bush’s memoir, which had been on the bestseller list for all of  8 weeks and which prompted him to say:

The critics of George W. Bush should think twice about being so critical because, you know, if there are people who buy these books in the millions of copies, there’s got to be something to it, you know what I mean, I’m not gong to say what… But there’s got to be something to it.

It’s this kind of crass commercialism—coupled with right-wing idiocy—that turned many editors and authors against Vitale during his tenure at Random House. He is famous in particular for a fight he took up with publisher André Schiffrin, who ran Pantheon Books from 1961 until 1990, when Vitale forced him to resign. The move was something of a disaster for Vitale: the entire Pantheon editorial department quit in protest, and numerous authors and editors—including Kurt Vonnegut, Studs Terkel, and Barbara Ehrenreichprotested in front of Random House’s offices. Huge bestselling authors, including James Michener, threatened to leave Random House.

But the incident is something to look back fondly on in the new interview. Vitale recalls that:

One of the first things I did [after arriving at Random House] is to sit down with the head of Pantheon [André Schiffrin] and I said to him: “We have to make money,” as they were losing money hand over fist. I wanted him to prepare a budget, and he refused to prepare a budget, and he refused to make any changes, so I said to him ‘goodbye.’ The next thing I knew, I had authors picketing outside the front door of the company. It was unpleasant…but the net result is that Pantheon is still alive and doing well today.

I asked Schiffrin about Vitale’s version of the Pantheon fight. He replied in an email that “His account of Pantheon is totally inaccurate. We gave him a budget, which he then proposed to slash by two-thirds—of the titles and the staff.” (Schiffrin tells his version of events in his memoir, A Political Education, published by Melville House.)

And while it’s true that a Random House imprint called Pantheon still exists, it bears little resemblance to the house as it was run under Schiffrin, certainly not in the number of titles published: The Summer 2012 Pantheon catalog contains just 12 titles, a huge fall from the 100 or so titles the old Pantheon published each year.

The new interview, however, doesn’t just focus on ancient history. It gives Vitale the opportunity to expand on a number of current publishing topics. He thinks agency pricing is too high—all ebooks should be $9.99 or less, he says—ponders higher margins with digital technologies, and proclaims, as if it’s interesting, that ebooks are a “major opportunity for publishers.” The interviewer asks Vitale about the difference between Europe and the U.S.—I presume the question was meant to refer to the book markets in the US and Europe—but Vitale replies by saying “Europe is moving slowly, and the United States is moving very fast” and then proceeds to bash Europe, which he has been doing for years.

Asked about Google and Amazon, he says, sure, they’ll be important players and adds “maybe AOL” too. I’ve never worked as a CEO, but if you could buy stock premised on the idea that AOL will never be important to the future of book publishing, I would buy it all.

The interview is also filled with some of Vitale’s characteristic right-wing barbs — “Free markets cannot be regulated”! — and more complaints about European politics:

The unions, the socialistic approach…Everybody thinks that they deserve pension, they deserve vacation, they deserve education, they deserve medical care…Nonsense!

Want to hear more of this? I don’t—but if it’s your kind of thing, feel free to quote Vitale as if he knows what he’s talking about, or hire him to consult on your publishing-related business. I’ll look to never hear from him again.

 

Kelly Burdick is the executive editor of Melville House.

2 Comments

  1. Kelly, I’m not sure whether to thank you for linking through to this interview or resent you for your suggestion that it is pointless to have published it in the first place. Perhaps it has no relevance to the immediate concerns of the business since Vitale is not practicing publishing any longer and what he has to say is “old news,” but one might charitably say the same about Schiffrin, who has spent the last several years touring the world and giving speeches at publishing conferences elaborating on what he wrote in “The Business of Books” 12 years ago. What this type of interview does is provide a historical context for the evolution fo the publishing business, for better or worse. I assume that Melville House’s publication of Schiffrin’s 2007 memoir served much the same purpose.

    Ed Nawotka, Editor-in-Chief, Publishing Perspectives

  2. The opening line of this article is sufficient to encapsulate the extremely prejudiced view which the author adopts throughout. Alberto Vitale retired from publishing, a field he devoted his life to, in order to spend time with his growing family (he had seven grandchildren by 2002), does this make him dead? He has spent the last couple of years devoting himself to philanthropic work in academic and artistic institutions (curious since according to the author he dislikes books) and has thus been very in touch with the worlld. While it is understandable that he does not have the authority of a current publisher on these topics, he has a complete right to express his educated opinion on the matter. As to his right wing views, of course he is right wing; an almost eighty year old white male who has devoted much of his life to finace will generally hold republican views. I do not think that this makes him crazy or any less of an authority than the obviously left-leaning author of this article. Alberto Vitale is a charismatic and truly good-hearted person and one who I hold very dear to my heart, and thus this article with its personal attacks shocks and upsets me for its complete lack of professionalism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

MobyLives